Learned On...

Green Expectations: When A Label is Redundant

As most of you know, I came to sustainability by way of marketing to women.  And, it never ceases to amaze me just how much my women’s market knowledge can be directly applied to the “green” realm.  Take the “green silo” versus integrated sustainability topic, for one.  Within a recent Inspired Economist post by Emili DeMasi about green MBA programs, specifically, lies what I see as a broader sustainability truth.  In most cases, brands and organizations – like colleges – should have long since crossed the line from needing to point out their green-ness and instead be actually integrating it throughout.

Just as was the big point in  Don’t Think Pink, the book I co-authored on marketing to women, I could now write a book called “Don’t Think Green.” With both titles, and upon first bookstore glance, readers might think: “Well, that’s counter-intuitive.  Why’s a sustainability (marketing to women) expert writing about NOT thinking green (pink)?” Because these are cultural transitions, not just static situations that will never change.

Think about it: Most businesses have gone from seeing women as this separate, oddly “new” or “emerging” market (!) to understanding that they are THE market for the most part.  Now companies are a lot better at transparently reaching them.  Women EXPECT that brands will serve their needs and ways of buying without a pink or “for women” label.

We now seem to be reaching that same historic point in the sustainability realm, whereby the consumers most brands want to reach are savvy to “green wash”( a la special packaging or corporate reports that talk, but don’t necessarily walk sustainability).  Instead, these folks may soon EXPECT sustainability from brands, and from all angles (product design and marketing to facilities, fleet management and community relations, etc).

That being the case, rather than helping a brand, hyper-visible, “look at me” green marketing may actually hurt it.  If you need to shout about it, will your customers believe you are taking steps to fully integrate sustainability throughout your corporation? Maybe not. A squeaky green wheel does, initially, help call attention to your company’s shift and let sustainably-minded consumers know they’ve been heard.  Still, at some point the wise brand oils that wheel, stops the shouting, and makes sustainability a fluid and integral part of their every function.

Universities can’t teach all the traditional MBA classes and then offer a sustainability seminar on the side.  It doesn’t make sense.  In the same way, brands can’t do everything else the way they always have, but slap a green label on it.  It reminds me of the early days of marketing active sports to women, where a snowboard or bike might be painted a pastel color and tagged “for women,” without any real design change.  Don’t let the green version of this happen to you!

Whether for an MBA program or on a brand, green labels may “feel” like a step toward sustainability by those who cleverly thought them up.  However, they can distract from and potentially delay more intentional and committed integration of true sustainability.  Why give prospective students or consumers anything to be suspicious of?  Instead, truly serve the rising and serious green expectations of all your stakeholders, and leave the “we’re so green” label behind.

Bookmark and Share
  • Jim Sullivan

    One of the relevant issues here is, as you asked in your last post, Why? Companies' reasons for greenwashing may be as spurious as their reasons for “getting on Facebook” (I recently noticed that a bag of tortillas I was eating had a Facebook page?!). Does baseless green labeling help sell products and services? I think we doubt it does, but maybe nobody's keeping score….

  • http://www.ethixventures.com Aria DiSalvo

    @Jim- I think consumers do face “label fatigue” with environmental and labor claims being made in many different ways. That may mean some people buy it anyway, but my fear is that without clear meaning these labels will encourage consumers to just buy the cheapest product (which is not often the most ethical). If a company cares only about sales, and they're diversified with plenty of non-ethical products, then they win either way.