Learned On...

With CSR: Go Slow, But START Already!

New “Shared Responsibility” research from Cone LLC finds that companies are failing to engage consumers in their social responsibility efforts. Has your company already begun to address this, or is it one of the slow starters?   What, praytell, are you waiting for?

Some of the Cone numbers that prove the point (and I highly recommend you download and memorize the entire, succinct, 6 page PDF):

  • 75% of  consumers want “the opportunity to voice my opinion to a company about its social/environmental practices and products (e.g., provide comments on the company’s Web site or blog, review products).”
  • 65% “believe I can have an influence on companies’ efforts toward environmental and social change.”
  • 85% and 81%  of consumers want to be engaged on company topics like “how it conducts its business” and “the social and environmental issues it supports,” respectively.

And, whatever you do, don’t bemoan how this social and environmental responsibility stuff doesn’t have anything to do with business, because:

92% of Americans (finding it either Very Important – 51% or Somewhat Important – 41%) ” look to business, government and nonprofit organizations to collaborate to solve social and environmental issues.”

So why do three-quarters of Americans give companies a “C” or below on how they’re engaging consumers around key issues? Two possible excuses, that I refute:

YOUR particular consumer market is very unique and so doesn’t fall under the purview of this study. Oh really… Are any women buying your products or services?  If so, they’ve been taking a more holistic view of companies and brands for a long time now – much before the terms “corporate social responsibility” or “sustainability” rolled so trippingly off our wisened tongues.  Women make purchase decisions based not only on the linear facts, but also on the more relational or emotional elements – like: what’s in a corporate name/reputation (BP may be able to educate us on this one).

Your corporation’s executive/management team is not quite ready to face the fact that they’ve got responsibility-related issues that are destined to become huge problems. “CSR-wash” dabblings -by way of marketing tactics- are a fool’s errand at this point (but, go ahead while the rest of us laugh). Instead, REALLY committing, fessing up to mistakes and starting on a path toward a more sustainable and responsible business is your only choice,  both to deliver on the consumer-expected “social” good and to achieve twenty-first century business innovation (even the Harvard Business Review says so!).

My point is not that you need to jump fast and loose to get on the CSR case.  That will only change stakeholder perception for a moment or two – and then your efforts will fall apart.  Instead, go slow and be intentional with your approach – but START already!  To me, Cone’s report reflects that consumers are getting tired of waiting, and they are anxious to show much love to the early entrants.

Bookmark and Share
  • http://thoughtsfromthewell.wordpress.com Maggie

    I've read your post on “Looking through a different lens” this morning on HuffPost. I could not agree more! Specific to this post “CSR, Go slow but start…”, I won't follow through on impulse, but could enthusiastically list 'countless' annoyances I have with products, packaging, (and promotion, except I tend to ignore advertising, preferring to research a product, make comparisons, etc., before I buy.) I find 'cute convenience' rampant and annoying – example: 'zip loc' type closings on frozen food bags. These often don't work satisfactorily, and a rubber band works fine and can be re-used! How much production bother is there, and how much 'behind the scenes' promotion of this 'cute' innovation is there? I avoid purchases when I can that have this device. I've also recently decided to avoid plastic container 'bottles and jars' however and whenever possible. I happen to live where there is no re-cycling and am mindful of that Pacific Plastic and Trash Island! With other packaging, I will do without a product unless I very much need it unless all plastic (product and packaging both) is minimal. Recent delight: purchase of an old-fashioned 'carpet sweeper' (manual, has roller brushes, etc.) sold by Bissell – is not a 'plastic' device, and all packaging was cardboard! I came to your blog site from the Huffington Post article. I am so pleased for your observations there, and also for what appears your more general dedication to boosting human awareness toward improved lives for all. Thank you! Best Regards, Maggie

  • AndreaLearned

    Thanks much for taking time to comment here, Maggie. I love to hear that my thoughts/writing spark ideas, new thinking or action! My work tends to focus on bigger picture, cultural trends/movements that interconnect around sustainability. But, it is the on-the-ground things like your efforts in plastic packaging decisions that make brands notice at their bottom lines. That may still be the only real point that they'll take note.

    My job is to keep people thinking – both as consumers AND as professionals within organizations who may have influence on product development, marketing, facilities and supply chain decisions.