Learned On | gender, consumer behavior and sustainability

Learned On...

Sustainability Leadership: SHIFT or SHOW?

So, why did I undertake the exercise of polling my readers/Twitter followers on the question of who the “women at the forefront of sustainability” might be? Because, I’d noticed a gender imbalance in the names of those who have written the majority of the books and articles I’ve come across in my own intensive research.  So – that begged the question.

Now, if you know me at all, you know I’m not setting this up as a men versus women discussion.  Rather, the awareness of who gets “known” for sustainability versus who doesn’t (yet continues to do amazing work) is what fascinates me.  It’s the same for many industries – there are those who SHOW and become the go-to interviews or citations for mass media coverage, and there are those who SHIFT – who are in the trenches making connections, and doing the science or activism that slowly helps nudge the larger change.

The two are not mutually exclusive, however.  Perhaps it is a matter of sequence.  SHIFT work often comes before SHOW recognition.  In most cases, SHOW can slow down a thought-leading/pioneer’s SHIFT work, but, because it starts to put some more mass awareness shine on the topic, this SHOW remains important.  On the other hand, some SHIFTers likely choose to lay low, determined to use their strengths to make a difference without being distracted by the whole other world of SHOW.

Though admittedly flawed in a variety of ways, my unscientific poll did prove the point that there are many, many women of the SHIFT whose names are not getting elevated to the SHOW.  And, perhaps these folks are really much too busy SHIFTING to care.  That’s a perfectly good explanation.

With regard to the poll results, specifically,  it is of particular interest that the three women who received the most votes – Shari Aaron (co-author of Climb the Green Ladder), Kira Gould (co-author of Women In Green) and Jill Fehrenbacher  (founder of the sustainable design trends site, Inhabitat.com) – are all perhaps most recognized for their part in spreading word of the SHIFT.  They are making sure sustainability DOES reach the masses by way of their written words.  These women are at the leading edge, making it their mission to broadcast the sustainability wisdom and innovation that will change organizational and consumer behavior in incredible ways.

It is my contention that in order to bridge conventional business to more sustainable practices, those of us involved will have to resist the temptation to overly focus on the SHOW, and give SHIFT a lot more “air time.”  In very basic terms – SHOW could be defined as being more about the linear idea of what or who is the best, smartest or most successful.  That ALONE is not in keeping with the idea of sustainability.  Instead, the more relational, connected, working together, on-the-ground perspective of SHIFT work is also crucial to the balance of the sustainable movement’s efficient functioning.

So, just as we look to the most recognized names (Hawken, Anderson, and Elkington, etc.) for inspiration and guidelines, so too do we need to ensure that SHIFTers (men and women) have the resources and support they need to keep the engines of sustainability moving strongly forward.  Given their dedication, there is no doubt they will soon get to SHOW whether they want to or not.

Bookmark and Share
  • Andrea,
    Really thought provoking post. I think some of it has to do with the fact that the voices we hear most through traditional media and marketing channels are from business leaders (who are still mostly male), even when it comes to sustainability, because a) they have the means to promote their vision via PR or conference attendance, books, etc. and b) the thing of most mass market interest is how we are going to do all these "good" things and still be an economic powerhouse. For better or worse, we are a SHOW-driven society (just look at the healthcare debate...). I think the SHIFTers will get their day, but it will likely be after we all believe on a wider scale. Then people will want to dig into how it all actually came together.
  • GiselaG
    Hi Andrea,

    This is interesting and you are right about the critical mass build. Women are communicators and natural networkers, they lack the degree of nepotistic tendency that men clearly display and view collaboration as a 'powertool', so are just perfectly naturally embedded in creating shifts be it in consciousness or through idea creation/generation and action. Potentially men create a peers congratulating peers scenario, whirling into a pool of so called 'expert' status amongst and against one another seems to set the benchmark and create the precedent - rightly or wrongly. It feels to me women want to remain close to source and be more akin to the 'real deal'. Walking the talk rather than only talking the talk is, at the end of the day, more meaningful. John Elkington was not the sole founder of SustAbility, but did so with Julia Hailes (http://www.juliahailes.com/) who is not (as far as I can see) among the most mentioned individuals.

    Thank you for the interesting reading as what you mention applies across so many spaces.

    best,
    Gisela
  • It would seem that rather than any inherent gender imbalance, the rich-get-richer effect is at work here. Those we go to for guidance and inspiration, the shows, simply have a head start over the shifts that just gets reinforced as time goes by.

    The shifts out there just don't have the same motivation as the shows. Plus -- and this may be a bit more gender-based -- men have a greater tendency to show off and self-promote, hence dominating among the shows.
  • AndreaLearned
    I agree with you Peter. As far as the gender imbalance, men just have a head start (in most industries) in terms of acknowledgement/success/being seen as "leaders." It is what it is. I think a lot of the SHOWs - many of whom are women - will get up to speed very quickly. It will be fun to watch.
blog comments powered by Disqus