<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are &#8220;Women&#8217;s&#8221; Sites Necessary: The Broad(er) Implications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://learnedon.com/2009/12/womens-sites-broader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://learnedon.com/2009/12/womens-sites-broader/</link>
	<description>Learned On &#124; gender, consumer behavior and sustainability</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:39:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandra</title>
		<link>http://learnedon.com/2009/12/womens-sites-broader/comment-page-1/#comment-2028</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnedonwomen.com/?p=3529#comment-2028</guid>
		<description>Double X really bothered me. It was obvious that what Ann Friedman wrote about women&#039;s writing &quot;mucking up&quot; the main product was the POV behind the creation of Double X. 

As I read the articles there, I started wondering what the submission guidelines were. Were you supposed to check the content of your pants before deciding whether to submit at Slate or Double X, or were you supposed to decide based on how &quot;womanly&quot; your topic was? Or were you only supposed to submit &quot;womanly&quot; topics to Double X if you had a vagina, but otherwise you could submit at Slate? 

And, most importantly, who ever thought Double X was a good idea?

*mind boggles*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Double X really bothered me. It was obvious that what Ann Friedman wrote about women&#8217;s writing &#8220;mucking up&#8221; the main product was the POV behind the creation of Double X. </p>
<p>As I read the articles there, I started wondering what the submission guidelines were. Were you supposed to check the content of your pants before deciding whether to submit at Slate or Double X, or were you supposed to decide based on how &#8220;womanly&#8221; your topic was? Or were you only supposed to submit &#8220;womanly&#8221; topics to Double X if you had a vagina, but otherwise you could submit at Slate? </p>
<p>And, most importantly, who ever thought Double X was a good idea?</p>
<p>*mind boggles*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Learned</title>
		<link>http://learnedon.com/2009/12/womens-sites-broader/comment-page-1/#comment-2001</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Learned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnedonwomen.com/?p=3529#comment-2001</guid>
		<description>The recent ForbesWoman poll.. does the phrase &quot;you guys&quot; bother women... is an interesting case study. http://www.forbes.com/2009/11/30/professional-behavior-sexism-forbes-woman-leadership-workplace-etiquette.html There are women who really take offense and, it seems, plenty others who don&#039;t even notice.  I&#039;m of the latter group myself.. and consider it just a formality/informality difference as opposed to a sexist thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recent ForbesWoman poll.. does the phrase &#8220;you guys&#8221; bother women&#8230; is an interesting case study. <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/11/30/professional-behavior-sexism-forbes-woman-leadership-workplace-etiquette.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.forbes.com/2009/11/30/professional-behavior-sexism-forbes-woman-leadership-workplace-etiquette.html</a> There are women who really take offense and, it seems, plenty others who don&#8217;t even notice.  I&#8217;m of the latter group myself.. and consider it just a formality/informality difference as opposed to a sexist thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Scherer</title>
		<link>http://learnedon.com/2009/12/womens-sites-broader/comment-page-1/#comment-2000</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Scherer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnedonwomen.com/?p=3529#comment-2000</guid>
		<description>Great post, Andrea. I have often had thoughts along the lines of what Ann Friedman wrote - and can&#039;t wait to read that whole article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Andrea. I have often had thoughts along the lines of what Ann Friedman wrote &#8211; and can&#8217;t wait to read that whole article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
